Eilliot Joahill

Caught in high rioting and  what the courts believe to be a public disorder offensive, that was programmed by the, ' Public States' of Rights' to demonstrations' in the land.

As the courts of laws', meaning the establishments', know-well, during demonstrations' of public outcries of furthering rights of land freedoms for individuals',  acting as one body, moments of irrationalities' can become scenes' of strikes that were not intended as such.

Joahill, statement of accounts through strong recollections of  events', depicking through council advice, has stated, that heated events took over his usual self control, having no previous record, this should go as a credit to his character of witness statements'.

He never intended to pick up a unidentified object that happened to be a misplaced weapon, these  actions occur during moments' of high disorders' of street riots and self body defence mechanisams'.

He states that the window of the police car appeared to be closed, or partly open by a small air gap, wih advancing technologies' of secired window fittings in such police systemic protection plans', thought that the brick would'nt have gone straight throghth the penal causing police harms of  contacts to body.

He states' that intent to harm was'nt the intent, rather just minor car damage to vent his anger and further express freedom rights'.

With this, we hope that the courts issue a warning to him in his youth, any recurring violence will incurr the sentance be reissued in full, he be made to pay a small fee and do a 18 month community service for mistake to hit, rather there was glass there, otherwise the lady would'nt have incurred glass injury and an exaggeration of mislayed information must have been given with countering police statements'.